Bro soriano ang dating daan Free sexs chat site
Indeed, he condemned Michael for acting like a prostitute in attacking him on the air.And fourth, the Court appears to have given a literal meaning to what Soriano said.Sandoval (Michael) of the Iglesia ni Cristo attacked petitioner Soriano of the Ang Dating Daan for alleged inconsistencies in his Bible teachings. Yung putang babae ang gumagana lang doon yung ibaba, kay Michael ang gumagana ang itaas, o di ba! Acting swiftly, the latter preventively suspended the airing of Soriano’s Ang Dating Daan television program for 20 days, pursuant to its powers under Section 3(d) of Presidential Decree 1986 and its related rules. Meanwhile, after hearing the main case or on September 27, 2004, the MTRCB found Soriano guilty as charged and imposed on him a penalty of three months suspension from appearing on the Ang Dating Daan program. A thing is prurient when it arouses lascivious thoughts or desires or tends to arouse sexual desire.
If at all, petitioner Soriano’s breach of the rule of decency is slight, . x x x Imagine how the above would sound if translated into any of the Filipino vernaculars. It is not likely that they would give up programs of interest to them just to listen to Soriano drawing a distinction between “faith” and “work or action.” The Court has stretched the “child” angle beyond realistic proportions.Here, there is a tension between the rights of candidates to address their constituents and the interest of the people in healthy undisturbed sleep.The Court would probably uphold the ordinance since public interest demands a quiet night’s rest for all and since the restraint on the freedom of speech is indirect, conditional, and partial.The hosts of the two shows have regularly engaged in verbal sparring on air, hurling accusations and counter-accusations with respect to their opposing religious beliefs and practices. For a 15-second outburst of its head at his bitterest critics, it seems not fair for the Court to close down this Bible ministry to its large followers altogether for a full quarter of a year. Primarily, it is obscenity on television that the constitutional guarantee of freedom of speech does not protect.
It appears that in his program Ang Tamang Daan, Michael M. Sobra ang kasinungalingan ng demonyong ito…” Michael and seven other ministers of the Iglesia ni Cristo lodged a complaint against petitioner Soriano before the MTRCB. As the Court’s decision points out, the test of obscenity is whether the average person, applying contemporary standards, would find the speech, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest.
Its real meaning is that Michael was acting like a prostitute in mouthing the ideas of anyone who cared to pay him for such service. The Bible itself uses the word “prostitute” as a figure of speech. Here, however, there is no question that Soriano attacked Michael, using figure of speech, at past in the evening, not at in the afternoon.